A A A

IMPORTANT MESSAGE: Meeting Minutes, Club Chit-Chat, and Fishing Reports will be listed if you are a member of Chapter 50. If you are a member, and you cannot see the reports after logging in, please use the contact form by selecting the floating envelope icon located in the bottom-right corner. Include your name and your Chapter 50 membership number. We will verify, and grant you special rights to view all. Alternatively, you may email us at muskiesincpennjersey @ gmail .

Please consider registering
Guest
sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_TopicIcon
take fishing away ??
October 7, 2009
10:07 pm
Guest
Guests

Updated: October 6, 2009, 10:21 AM ET
Feds meddling with accessComment Email Print Share Bassmaster.com

Federally mandated no-fishing zones could soon be popping up in the Great Lakes and many other freshwater fisheries.Just imagine, you pull up on a boat ramp on Lake Erie and discover a large map of the lake that has enough shaded blocks to play checkers. Those shaded blocks represent areas closed to fishing, and your favorite rockpile — that you've been daydreaming about dragging a tube over for the last month — is under one of those blocks.

Sound unlikely? Freshwater anglers have been warned that, in the not-too-distant future, marine sanctuaries and the general protectionism philosophies plaguing our recreational saltwater brethren were coming our way. Well, the future has arrived, and it is time to pay attention.

"BASS members and every angler in America should be very concerned over the dramatic implications for recreational fishing access and management nationwide that are being proposed by the White House Council on Environmental Quality. This policy extends into the Great Lakes and the inland watersheds that flow into the oceans, which, of course, includes every river, stream and most lakes and reservoirs in America," said Phil Morlock, director of environmental affairs for Shimano Corp.

The American Sportfishing Association has similar concerns. "Anglers in the heartland may think this is just about saltwater, but it's not. This is a policy that will ultimately influence all our nation's bodies of water, state and federal. Now is the time to step up and ensure that recreational fishing has its rightful place in the policy process," said Gordon Robertson, vice president of ASA.

Flying in under the radar screen for most anglers, saltwater or fresh, President Obama created an Interagency Oceans Task Force with the objective of establishing a national policy to govern the management and use of our oceans, coasts and Great Lakes. Within this objective is the development of a framework for setting aside blocks of water for various uses. Never before have freshwater systems like the Great Lakes been discussed in the context of "spatial zoning." Yet it's there in black and white in the task force's interim report. It's the first real segue of federal no-fishing zones into the bass angler's living room.

Despite both a face-to-face meeting between representatives of recreational anglers and the Council on Environmental Quality (the lead federal agency for the task force), and a follow-up with written comments in the initial phase of the process, none of the comments from the recreational community were incorporated in the interim report. And there doesn't appear to be any intention of doing so. As an angler, that should be both frustrating and alarming.

"There are over 133,600 BASS members in the states bordering the Great Lakes. Obviously, they have a huge stake in this. Yet, as of now, the federal government doesn't appear to be interested in what they have to say. Unlike other administrations, this one seems to have dismissed the angling community altogether, at least to this point. We need that to change, and fast," said Chris Horton, conservation director for BASS.

Like all Americans, anglers want healthy oceans, estuaries and freshwater lakes and rivers. In fact, they're often the first to raise awareness of problems, first to pick up a shovel to help or open their wallets to fund a solution.

Anglers were among the nation's first and foremost conservationists. Through voluntary excise taxes on sportfishing equipment, anglers have contributed more than $5 billon for fisheries management to date. Yet, these contributions have yet to be acknowledged by either the CEQ or in the task force's interim report. They most certainly aren't aware of, nor can they possibly appreciate, the countless hours of sweat equity that anglers have contributed through on-the-ground projects to enhance our fisheries and habitat across the country. Without question, anglers have earned the right to have a say in what happens with their resource and their ability to enjoy that resource.

"Not only did the task force essentially ignore the detailed input from the recreational fishing community in their report, they also failed to acknowledge the significant number of jobs and the economy, which is supported by over 60 million Americans who fish," said Morlock.

Like most federal documents, the interim report may seem overwhelming and somewhat confusing. However, those who deal with federal agencies and represent the angling community in Washington clearly see the warning signals. Here are some of the most pertinent questions:

Why does the federal government refuse to separate recreational anglers from commercial fishing when the impacts on the resource are vastly different?
Why the rush to get such an overwhelming policy done in 180 days?
The document repeatedly mentions the need for the U.S. to ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. What jurisdictional ramifications does that have for fisheries management in waters currently managed by the U.S.?
What implications do this policy and the UNCLOS have for all inland fresh waters?
Even though it was listed in the president's directive memo, why does the interim report shy away from sustainable use objectives?
State natural resource agencies have done a great job of managing our fisheries resources in the Great Lakes. What justification does the federal government have to interfere?
Finally, why is there no congressional oversight in a process that will obviously affect millions of Americans?

Anglers have an opportunity to change the process and ensure these questions are addressed.

"This policy strikes at the fundamental issue that concerns all anglers and should concern all people who enjoy time on the water, which is access to our nation's public resources. It is crucial that anglers speak up and let the White House and their members of Congress know that they have serious concerns with any policy that excludes recreational fishing, thereby ignoring the tremendous conservation legacy that anglers have on this country's economy and culture," said Robertson.

In order to ensure that a meaningful, transparent public process will give direction to the federal government as they determine the future of our angling heritage, Congress will have to step in. Currently, that process is virtually nonexistent. As one of the largest constituencies for any member of Congress, anglers have the ability to get them involved, and Congress will — if they hear from enough folks out there.

Go to http://www.keepamericafishing.org and send a message to the CEQ and Congress that anglers have earned the right for our voices to be heard and for our angling heritage to be preserved in perpetuity.

President John F. Kennedy once said, "One person can make a difference, and everyone should try."

Click here to JOIN BASS!

October 7, 2009
11:39 pm
Avatar
Pineyfishmagnet
Pinebarrens N.J.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1749
Member Since:
January 19, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yep, its comin thanks to the people who think socialism is the answer. Enviro-statism. Statist has a big time appetite for control!! Welcom to apart of my life tryin to clam in Barnegat Bay. I so not like politics!!! ;D

October 8, 2009
3:35 pm
DL
Member
MI50 group
Forum Posts: 2213
Member Since:
March 22, 2004
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hey,

Now, now, if we allow them to put certain parts of the Great Lakes, Atlantic and Pacific coastal waters and freshwater estuaries, off limits, it will provide a wide array of social and commercial perks. It will allow our great statesmen, and women, to take foreign dignitaries to secluded, and untouched, places for recreation while our government sells our rights and freedoms to the U.N.. It will allow our glorious government to sell the mineral and gas rights to all of our natural resources to the highest bidder and will foster our pursuit of third world status for both our country and ourselves.
But by golly keep your attention on our health care policy, or was that immigration, or maybe gas prices. Face it people, we're being f*cked by every politician and I don't give a damn what color banner, red or blue, they travel under. I say flush out Washington and put people in there with careers in business, the sciences and the military. These are the people who know how to get things done correctly.
And this ends my soapbox rant of the day.

DL

DL

October 8, 2009
6:37 pm
Avatar
STUBBORN DUTCHY
Member
MI50 group
Forum Posts: 2219
Member Since:
August 28, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Piney, couldn't agree with you more. Let'em try to keep me off of where I want to fish. Screw'em!!!!!
People thought "CHANGE" was the right vote this time...........IDIOTS!!!!!!! We're going to get change alright. Just none of the changes we need.

ITS NOT THE SIZE OF YOUR BOAT
ITS THE SIZE OF WHATS ON YOUR BUMPBOARD!
M.T.F

October 9, 2009
1:06 am
Avatar
Pineyfishmagnet
Pinebarrens N.J.
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1749
Member Since:
January 19, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think i so a bumper sticker that read- if they outlaw guns can we use SWORDS!! ha ha ha and on the same vehicle OBAMA, another reason stupid people shouldnt vote! Of course i dont feel that way, 😉 i already knew what he was about!! first generation!! 😮 ::) thanks Jeremy. Ron

Forum Timezone: America/New_York
Most Users Ever Online: 593
Currently Online:
144
Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 563
Moderators: 3
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 7
Forums: 42
Topics: 5516
Posts: 38612
Newest Members:
Franksemiz, Danielskeks, BrianTen
Moderators: blkdrs: 2010, Mike D: 1999, Archie: 475
Administrators: adminarchie: 13, mi50 webmaster: 0

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

©2024 MUSKIES INC Chapter 50 Penn Jersey

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account